(19-08-2015, 20:40)JasonRT Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 19:44)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 04:34)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ] (18-08-2015, 19:56)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ]Pfft as said before each site has valid points and useful info ukp, saafe etc
You just got to draw from the useful parts and ignore the parts that are negative as mentioned above you ultimately have to think for yourself
Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy
True every site has both useful information along with a little crap unfortunately the opposite is true of UK Punting where the crap seems to be given priority. I have learned to think for myself that's why I'm not fooled by kids, Barristers or any other of the assorted oddballs unlike you and most others on UK Punting, tell me comaaminion had you worked out that James999 was actually Admin, you can't answer that of course can you or you'll be banned.
You do realise don't you that by letting all this nonsense continue your Admin is really saying "I can feed this bunch of idiots anything and they'll believe it" if your happy being treated like that fine that's your choice.
"Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy" well do make sure you tell that to the Admin on UK Punting as you'll find his views on SAAFE are rather more forthright than my own, sorry I forgot you can't tell him can you because he'll ban you.
I don't think I have been malicious as all I've really done is drawn attention to a small amount of the fake stuff on your site, shouldn't you be thanking me, and please don't forget I have praised the site occasionally as well.
Bottom line is I'd be all in favour of a site where "the punter comes first" but I'm not to enthusiastic about a site where the fantasist comes first and the bloke in charge is using it to wage his sad little vendetta against all wgs.
The whole admin/james thing I don't care if that's correct or not makes no odds or difference to me, I'm not looking for conspiracy or the truth just a decent informative site that can give me a heads up on reliable wg's/sp's
As for saafe and hate mongering that's an opinion if someone does not like that site so be it , opinions differ that's life
On a personal level I have found admin and moderators helpful and informative, I read the site rules and follow them
Your entitled to your views but you strike me as someone who has either been burnt by ukp and is bitter or someone who has ideals and because they are not supported can't let it go
All I can say is be the person you want to be and on your own terms but your pissing in the wind if you can't do that without a forum majority, being bitter will just hold you back
Its not about people being bitter.
The main problem is there are users with 20+ reviews but they cant write in proper sentences. Unless Admin is a complete fool he must have noticed this. He doesn't ban the fantasists/pimps because he knows that will destroy the credibility of the site.
The stuff about james999 is to point out that you have a mod who spend all his time online acting like a child reading other members private messages and winding people up by making stupid comments. You can't criticize him or you will be banned.
The off topic section is like something you'd expect from a neo nazi website.
I think half the reviews on that site are bs fake and the work of pimps.
Well no
I can say after seeing it happen bullshit reviews/negatives are pulled and deleted and additionally nasty false members banned
It not easy to maintain order on a busy forum but I have seen admin acts of fairness happen it's not an sp hating dictatorship in my opinion I have seen it fairly moderated
As for off topic if I don't like the subject matter I don't engage that simple
(19-08-2015, 18:12)wife4rent Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 16:56)xKatieBabyx Wrote: [ -> ]Just joined up to have a nose and first thread I see they are linking copyrighted pictures from an AW private gallery. Pricks.
They will do that, I think that would be in breach of their web hosting company, whoever that is. Unless they are using some offshore hosting who don't give a dam.
Sarah x x x
They do use an off shore host that is why they do not need to UK law
(20-08-2015, 00:04)Bonker1972 Wrote: [ -> ]They do use an off shore host that is why they do not need to UK law
They run the site through cloudflare.com who are based in USA so would probably take any complaints seriously.
I expect the complaint would need to be either the person who is the owner of the image or AW where the images were used from.
Sarah x x x
u can dmca any website and have them well and truly Fucked up wherever they are, trust me. I've let the lady in question know so she can deal with it appropriately.
(19-08-2015, 16:56)xKatieBabyx Wrote: [ -> ]Just joined up to have a nose and first thread I see they are linking copyrighted pictures from an AW private gallery. Pricks.
That really is a matter for AW to look at as the site is encouraging it, AW should be looking out for it's members.
Did you check to see if your still on the Prostitute Blacklist or have they realised their mistake and started an Evil Cam Girl Blacklist, Am I on the Prostitute Blacklist because I bet that's what they think, "I reckon that Nova70 is really a lying cheating prossie"
JE SUIS PROSSIE
(19-08-2015, 19:44)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 04:34)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ] (18-08-2015, 19:56)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ]Pfft as said before each site has valid points and useful info ukp, saafe etc
You just got to draw from the useful parts and ignore the parts that are negative as mentioned above you ultimately have to think for yourself
Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy
True every site has both useful information along with a little crap unfortunately the opposite is true of UK Punting where the crap seems to be given priority. I have learned to think for myself that's why I'm not fooled by kids, Barristers or any other of the assorted oddballs unlike you and most others on UK Punting, tell me comaaminion had you worked out that James999 was actually Admin, you can't answer that of course can you or you'll be banned.
You do realise don't you that by letting all this nonsense continue your Admin is really saying "I can feed this bunch of idiots anything and they'll believe it" if your happy being treated like that fine that's your choice.
"Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy" well do make sure you tell that to the Admin on UK Punting as you'll find his views on SAAFE are rather more forthright than my own, sorry I forgot you can't tell him can you because he'll ban you.
I don't think I have been malicious as all I've really done is drawn attention to a small amount of the fake stuff on your site, shouldn't you be thanking me, and please don't forget I have praised the site occasionally as well.
Bottom line is I'd be all in favour of a site where "the punter comes first" but I'm not to enthusiastic about a site where the fantasist comes first and the bloke in charge is using it to wage his sad little vendetta against all wgs.
The whole admin/james thing I don't care if that's correct or not makes no odds or difference to me, I'm not looking for conspiracy or the truth just a decent informative site that can give me a heads up on reliable wg's/sp's
As for saafe and hate mongering that's an opinion if someone does not like that site so be it , opinions differ that's life
On a personal level I have found admin and moderators helpful and informative, I read the site rules and follow them
Your entitled to your views but you strike me as someone who has either been burnt by ukp and is bitter or someone who has ideals and because they are not supported can't let it go
All I can say is be the person you want to be and on your own terms but your pissing in the wind if you can't do that without a forum majority, being bitter will just hold you back
I was already aware of you from UK Punting before you came here and have read some of your posts, a bit fluffy for me ............your avatar I mean.You seem like a decent fair minded bloke like plenty of others on there but the problem is the person who runs your site isn't, he carries this grudge from whenever and uses the site as a means of revenge, the James999 thing is important as it's setting the tone, it's saying fakery is fine.
I am the person I want to be I don't need support or a "forum majority" I will say what I think and believe even if it's not popular and I can do that here without fear of being banned. You may be a decent bloke but just try going up against UK Punting Admin if you think something you see on there is unfair or just plain fantasy, he will ban you in a heartbeat.
I have honestly never seen a malicious review deleted, UK Punting policy is that anybody who claims to be a punter even a first time poster can make any allegation they want and do not need any evidence to support it, on UK Punting the fantasists, trolls and kids come first. The problem is your site is now so overrun by the idiots the real punters are outnumbered and even if you do try and put a stop to a nonsense thread the fantasists will keep fueling it and Admin will back them.
Take a look at "CB" now I'm not sure if he's a real punter or not but he had to be prompted into writing reviews by one of your long term members, but just check out what he gets up to, he's always trying to keep the fantasy/malicious threads going and he even started his own bareback accusation thread recently (not a review) now that kind of thing really gives me doubts but even if he is a real punter and he just might be it's clear what he's on the site for, that's what you and the other decent members are up against, the trouble is Admin will always back them against you.
Happy Punting
(20-08-2015, 00:57)wife4rent Wrote: [ -> ] (20-08-2015, 00:04)Bonker1972 Wrote: [ -> ]They do use an off shore host that is why they do not need to UK law
They run the site through cloudflare.com who are based in USA so would probably take any complaints seriously.
I expect the complaint would need to be either the person who is the owner of the image or AW where the images were used from.
Sarah x x x
A question, as I'm a seeker not a provider so don't know......does AW have the rights to any of your media, or do you still have sole rights?.....you like the disclaimer thing on FB which gives them rights?
Hope that made sense!
(20-08-2015, 03:17)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]JE SUIS PROSSIE
Just fucking buckled at this.
(20-08-2015, 08:33)Bonker1972 Wrote: [ -> ] (20-08-2015, 00:57)wife4rent Wrote: [ -> ] (20-08-2015, 00:04)Bonker1972 Wrote: [ -> ]They do use an off shore host that is why they do not need to UK law
They run the site through cloudflare.com who are based in USA so would probably take any complaints seriously.
I expect the complaint would need to be either the person who is the owner of the image or AW where the images were used from.
Sarah x x x
A question, as I'm a seeker not a provider so don't know......does AW have the rights to any of your media, or do you still have sole rights?.....you like the disclaimer thing on FB which gives them rights?
Hope that made sense!
No idea... You would need to be interested in reading such boring crap to know.
Sarah x x x
Hmmmm, was just wondering cause if private gallery pics are being displayed in a site (which shan't be mentioned) would the person who's pics they are be able to Perdue this or would it have to be AW, if that makes any sense