(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]It's not a campaign a protest or even policing
Surely it is a form of policing if your aim is to get things, that are wrong or you do not like removed
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]Should I join ? well how long would a real punter with a mind of his own last.
No idea, but at least you would have voiced your opinion directly to the members rather than waiting for them to find your posts elsewhere
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]Fantasists and trolls have realised this and know they can get away with almost anything and draw a crowd.
A crowd of men...
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]My posts have been directly effective because the Admin on UK Punting reads this forum, he sometimes comments on it but without actually naming it, why else do you think UberX's reviews were deleted,
If you say so...
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]... why else do you think UberX's reviews were deleted,
I don't give it any thought, I am banned from UKP and have no interest in it, so do not waste my time reading anything they post, about myself or others. Like I said before, why waste your time reading such crap, but you do.
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]...that was actually some achievement as it clearly states on the site "Reviews cannot be deleted" well apparently they can.
I think that you are taking that out of context and your ego has got the better of you.
The claim that "Reviews cannot be deleted" is surely aimed at genuine reviews, whilst you may claim they have many fake reviews i am sure that if a girl tried to get a genuine review by a punter removed it would not be, which, if I recall, was the complaint they had against Punternet, girls could get bad reviews deleted.
(19-08-2015, 13:10)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]Should UK Punting be ignored...
You generally ignore something that is in your space, be it virtual or physical. I do not need to ignore UKP I just don't visit the site.
Sarah x x x
I found this thread from a google search and would agree with most of what Nova70 wrote. The site has loads of influence because a it's linked to google searches.
I wrote a review there and was hassled constantly because I paid over £150 which according to them over on UKP means that the review is fake.
Some posters are decent but it's mainly filled with trolls pimps, kids and fake punters.
(18-08-2015, 00:38)wife4rent Wrote: [ -> ]Why are you guys so obsessed with UKP?
I was a member and got banned, there was a good reason for me to be banned, they didn't like me, fair enough. Do I constantly go back and look at what they are posting ? No!
Why? Because I really do not care, most of them are meaningless idiots, the rest are just sheep.
Do you find many girls looking at the site? No!
So why are you punters so obsessed with what they are doing? Either join them or ignore them
Sarah x x x
PS If you are banned it means that you are not welcome, take the hint
It's a pretty valid topic as UKP is the biggest review site in the UK and it doesn't allow any criticism. Lots of ladies on aw get business or lose business from that site so it is quite influential, hence why it's generating discussion, you don't have to be "obsessed" to want to discuss it or be concerned. This thread is useful as I can see it is helping a few people become wise the what is going on over there.
Also I don't really see your point unless you are the site owner/moderator. Why do you want to police what others are talking about?
If you don't want to discuss it or see discussion of UKP why not just stop clicking the UKP thread in the forum?
I'm not really aiming to get things removed just drawing attention to them as a way of pointing out the sites lack of credibility, no point in joining I'd be banned very quickly and my posts would be deleted.
"A crowd of men" mainly that's true but one of the worst offenders on the site is a wg "D" she's been suckered by plenty of the fantasists including the Barrister, so much for female intuition. I seem to recall a thread by a member with little posting history who was making a bareback allegation against a wg (yawn) "D" was one of the loudest voices screaming "name her, name her", perhaps her phone is a bit dusty and she wants to get rid of the opposition.
"Reviews cannot be deleted" that covers all reviews and even the author can't have a review deleted, Punternet offer a rebuttal, a wg could join up and challenge a review on UK Punting but if she absolutely proves it's fake she will be banned and her posts deleted, on UK Punting the fake punter comes first.
Your view is to ignore and by and large I'd agree but I think offering a counter point occasionally can have an effect and a positive one.
(19-08-2015, 15:01)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not really aiming to get things removed just drawing attention to them as a way of pointing out the sites lack of credibility, no point in joining I'd be banned very quickly and my posts would be deleted.
"A crowd of men" mainly that's true but one of the worst offenders on the site is a wg "D" she's been suckered by plenty of the fantasists including the Barrister, so much for female intuition. I seem to recall a thread by a member with little posting history who was making a bareback allegation against a wg (yawn) "D" was one of the loudest voices screaming "name her, name her", perhaps her phone is a bit dusty and she wants to get rid of the opposition.
"Reviews cannot be deleted" that covers all reviews and even the author can't have a review deleted, Punternet offer a rebuttal, a wg could join up and challenge a review on UK Punting but if she absolutely proves it's fake she will be banned and her posts deleted, on UK Punting the fake punter comes first.
Your view is to ignore and by and large I'd agree but I think offering a counter point occasionally can have an effect and a positive one.
D just writes what they want to hear probably the most pathetic member.
It's fine for people to say just to ignore it. It's a different matter though if you have been a victim of one of their lynch mobs or the false information they peddle over there.
(19-08-2015, 15:11)JasonRT Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 15:01)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not really aiming to get things removed just drawing attention to them as a way of pointing out the sites lack of credibility, no point in joining I'd be banned very quickly and my posts would be deleted.
"A crowd of men" mainly that's true but one of the worst offenders on the site is a wg "D" she's been suckered by plenty of the fantasists including the Barrister, so much for female intuition. I seem to recall a thread by a member with little posting history who was making a bareback allegation against a wg (yawn) "D" was one of the loudest voices screaming "name her, name her", perhaps her phone is a bit dusty and she wants to get rid of the opposition.
"Reviews cannot be deleted" that covers all reviews and even the author can't have a review deleted, Punternet offer a rebuttal, a wg could join up and challenge a review on UK Punting but if she absolutely proves it's fake she will be banned and her posts deleted, on UK Punting the fake punter comes first.
Your view is to ignore and by and large I'd agree but I think offering a counter point occasionally can have an effect and a positive one.
D just writes what they want to hear probably the most pathetic member.
It's fine for people to say just to ignore it. It's a different matter though if you have been a victim of one of their lynch mobs or the false information they peddle over there.
My point exactly, Sarah please take note.
Just joined up to have a nose and first thread I see they are linking copyrighted pictures from an AW private gallery. Pricks.
(19-08-2015, 16:56)xKatieBabyx Wrote: [ -> ]Just joined up to have a nose and first thread I see they are linking copyrighted pictures from an AW private gallery. Pricks.
They will do that, I think that would be in breach of their web hosting company, whoever that is. Unless they are using some offshore hosting who don't give a dam.
Sarah x x x
(19-08-2015, 04:34)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ] (18-08-2015, 19:56)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ]Pfft as said before each site has valid points and useful info ukp, saafe etc
You just got to draw from the useful parts and ignore the parts that are negative as mentioned above you ultimately have to think for yourself
Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy
True every site has both useful information along with a little crap unfortunately the opposite is true of UK Punting where the crap seems to be given priority. I have learned to think for myself that's why I'm not fooled by kids, Barristers or any other of the assorted oddballs unlike you and most others on UK Punting, tell me comaaminion had you worked out that James999 was actually Admin, you can't answer that of course can you or you'll be banned.
You do realise don't you that by letting all this nonsense continue your Admin is really saying "I can feed this bunch of idiots anything and they'll believe it" if your happy being treated like that fine that's your choice.
"Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy" well do make sure you tell that to the Admin on UK Punting as you'll find his views on SAAFE are rather more forthright than my own, sorry I forgot you can't tell him can you because he'll ban you.
I don't think I have been malicious as all I've really done is drawn attention to a small amount of the fake stuff on your site, shouldn't you be thanking me, and please don't forget I have praised the site occasionally as well.
Bottom line is I'd be all in favour of a site where "the punter comes first" but I'm not to enthusiastic about a site where the fantasist comes first and the bloke in charge is using it to wage his sad little vendetta against all wgs.
The whole admin/james thing I don't care if that's correct or not makes no odds or difference to me, I'm not looking for conspiracy or the truth just a decent informative site that can give me a heads up on reliable wg's/sp's
As for saafe and hate mongering that's an opinion if someone does not like that site so be it , opinions differ that's life
On a personal level I have found admin and moderators helpful and informative, I read the site rules and follow them
Your entitled to your views but you strike me as someone who has either been burnt by ukp and is bitter or someone who has ideals and because they are not supported can't let it go
All I can say is be the person you want to be and on your own terms but your pissing in the wind if you can't do that without a forum majority, being bitter will just hold you back
(19-08-2015, 19:44)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ] (19-08-2015, 04:34)Nova70 Wrote: [ -> ] (18-08-2015, 19:56)comaaminion Wrote: [ -> ]Pfft as said before each site has valid points and useful info ukp, saafe etc
You just got to draw from the useful parts and ignore the parts that are negative as mentioned above you ultimately have to think for yourself
Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy
True every site has both useful information along with a little crap unfortunately the opposite is true of UK Punting where the crap seems to be given priority. I have learned to think for myself that's why I'm not fooled by kids, Barristers or any other of the assorted oddballs unlike you and most others on UK Punting, tell me comaaminion had you worked out that James999 was actually Admin, you can't answer that of course can you or you'll be banned.
You do realise don't you that by letting all this nonsense continue your Admin is really saying "I can feed this bunch of idiots anything and they'll believe it" if your happy being treated like that fine that's your choice.
"Malice for places you don't approve of is wasted energy" well do make sure you tell that to the Admin on UK Punting as you'll find his views on SAAFE are rather more forthright than my own, sorry I forgot you can't tell him can you because he'll ban you.
I don't think I have been malicious as all I've really done is drawn attention to a small amount of the fake stuff on your site, shouldn't you be thanking me, and please don't forget I have praised the site occasionally as well.
Bottom line is I'd be all in favour of a site where "the punter comes first" but I'm not to enthusiastic about a site where the fantasist comes first and the bloke in charge is using it to wage his sad little vendetta against all wgs.
The whole admin/james thing I don't care if that's correct or not makes no odds or difference to me, I'm not looking for conspiracy or the truth just a decent informative site that can give me a heads up on reliable wg's/sp's
As for saafe and hate mongering that's an opinion if someone does not like that site so be it , opinions differ that's life
On a personal level I have found admin and moderators helpful and informative, I read the site rules and follow them
Your entitled to your views but you strike me as someone who has either been burnt by ukp and is bitter or someone who has ideals and because they are not supported can't let it go
All I can say is be the person you want to be and on your own terms but your pissing in the wind if you can't do that without a forum majority, being bitter will just hold you back
Its not about people being bitter.
The main problem is there are users with 20+ reviews but they cant write in proper sentences. Unless Admin is a complete fool he must have noticed this. He doesn't ban the fantasists/pimps because he knows that will destroy the credibility of the site.
The stuff about james999 is to point out that you have a mod who spend all his time online acting like a child reading other members private messages and winding people up by making stupid comments. You can't criticize him or you will be banned.
The off topic section is like something you'd expect from a neo nazi website.
I think half the reviews on that site are bs fake and the work of pimps.