Video clip removed

[Ana_X]

I had an adult baby erotica clip rejected for having 'underage' references. Total bollocks... of course, in the clip I'm talking as if I'm talking to a baby, but that's obviously the point. I don't make any reference in the clip to anyone underage, and adult baby minding is a recognised fetish on AW. I'm fairly certain they don't actually listen to the clips, just make judgement of the titles of them (reason I say this: I accidentally uploaded the wrong clip the other day; was only about 2 minutes inside of the 9 minutes that it was meant to be; It passed AW's checks, despite being wrong).

So I definitely think they rejected my clip without listening, which annoys me, because it probably means that recordings that DO have illegal content are slipping through the net, based entirely on a judgement of the title :/

I had a video pulled some time ago where I'm using a violet wand on a client and was explaining to him before I began using it that the violet wand was invented as a medical device. I mentioned that there were many ailments it could be used for, and it was even used on children.

When AW pulled the clip they said it was because of the reference to children, so I had to make that part of the audio silent, which rather ruined the continuity of the conversation. I could understand why they chose to pull the clip but really, context is key - there was no mention what so ever of anything sexual at the time.

I have so much footage from sessions kept in my own private archive because of the silly laws in this country. Shame really, that consenting and enlightened adults can't do as they please and share that enjoyment with others.

[TheMistressLola]

Some of the laws in this country are IMHO completely nonsensical in regards to pornography, prostitution, and what consenting adults can do behind the privacy of closed doors. What baffles me is that some sexual acts are completely legal to perform (such as fisting, watersports)... but illegal to film/publish under the Obscene Publications Act, on the basis that they are likely to 'deprave and corrupt'... *sigh*

As a side note... Did anyone happen to follow the court case of Michael Peacock last year (think it was known as the Obscenity Trial?). Worth googling and reading about if you're interested in Obscenity Laws. Plus Myles Jackson the lawyer who represented him (and other high profile OPA trials) has pretty interesting blog/twitter accounts under the name 'Obscenity Lawyer' too

[Ana_X]

Some of the laws in this country are IMHO completely nonsensical in regards to pornography, prostitution, and what consenting adults can do behind the privacy of closed doors. What baffles me is that some sexual acts are completely legal to perform (such as fisting, watersports)... but illegal to film/publish under the Obscene Publications Act, on the basis that they are likely to 'deprave and corrupt'... *sigh*

As a side note... Did anyone happen to follow the court case of Michael Peacock last year (think it was known as the Obscenity Trial?). Worth googling and reading about if you're interested in Obscenity Laws. Plus Myles Jackson the lawyer who represented him (and other high profile OPA trials) has pretty interesting blog/twitter accounts under the name 'Obscenity Lawyer' too

I followed the trial closely and nearly flipped the table I was sat at when I heard the not guilty verdict