WG --Average number of clients per week

[MissEsoteric]

I am not adorning the usual prefixed platitudes; with 'all due respect', or, 'please don't take this the wrong way', because you aren't 'due' any and there isn't any 'wrong' way to 'take' this, just the one way.

Hi Again,

I am new to this but I was wondering what would u think is the average number of clients a WG will meet in say an average week???
please provid ur best estimate.

Thank you

It is the author of an OP who inevitably must assume responsibility for pitching the tone of their thread appropriately, assessing the credibility of their post within the community. Your opening gambit, and post in its entirety, fails obnoxiously to display even an attempt at decency and respect for the majority of the members of whom this forum comprise.

But hey, who the fuck am I to bust your balls? We all misjudge things in these mediums, it's so easily done when reliant upon word alone. On the contrary, though, when the cheapness of your question (and manner in which it is posited) is alluded to, by way of perfect;ly civil reply, the ignorance of your initial comments and clearly premeditated arse-hole-ness, surely must be cemented as fact?

What does it matter how many clients a working man or Woman will see in a week?

So, you chose to publically pose the most personal, sensitive, private questions to a group of women, without introduction, being relatively 'unknown' to many members, without any explanation as to your purpose in asking the WG's to divulge to you their wholly private business and without the foresight or emotional intelligence to even share something of your own experience or opinion or feelings about the topic and as such find you are asked, politely and succinctly, to shed some light on these points, perhaps before being quoted on the number of cocks 'worked' in the time period of your choice.

Who got out of the wrong side of the bed ??? I am curious, but by the sound of you -- may I suggest the numbers will be low.

You respond to this, utterly measured, polite request, with a condescending jibe, worsened only by the laughable hypocrisy apparent in the post of a man clutching at bitchy comments and sly digs as a way of retort to a completely sane question. "........may you suggest........"? May I suggest you quite swiftly realise as to the crippling lack of authority, resonance, interest or substance, any such a suggestion from you will be subject to.

Like you, I was curious hence I asked what it mattered.

Are you any more or less likely to see a certain escort if she sees one man a week or ten? Why do you arrive at the certain decision that you make? Is it down to a perception you've made about the escort?

I didn't get out of the wrong side of the bed, I was engaging you in conversation.

I directly challenge you to produce one single example, from the post above, to support the claim you make below.

I was asking the innocent question out of curiosity. Not for any underlying *motive that you seem to be adhering too*, chill out huni. All I wanted to know was the average numbers per week i.e. 1, 21 or even 101.
Apologies if I have upset or annoyed any one, it truly was not meant. I am new to this, honestly.

*A 'motive' can not be 'adhered to', much less 'adhered TOO'

[MissEsoteric]

Very good Trinity--not just beauty, but also brains. What about a 4th reason I am a randy Tax Inspector --- calm down -- only joking.
I get enough wanks when I am in Private mode, looking at all you sexy ladies.
It is a pointless question as nobody is going to answer it, as you honestly state.

No, it is not a pointless question simply because nobody will answer. It is a pointless question as it was posed apparently for no other reason than to satisfy the banal curiosity of a random individual having offered nothing as a contribution or catalyst to providing value.

I think the main reason I asked, apart from being curious, was that I don't fancy seeing someone who has already serviced about 5 guys previously that day.

Can you explain what practical input, establishing some vague, unscientific, 'average', subject to complete obliteration when accounting for even just a few of the vast number of variables and acquired from a sample group so small as to single handedly discredit any 'findings', might have on whom, when or where you bestow your 'fancy'? What the fuck kinda nonsense is that?

Why would that bother me --- believe it or not, mostly down to potential hygiene problems, more than anything else.

I take it all back, now. I fully appreciate that if there have only been, say, three or maybe four punters preceeding you, any 'potential hygiene problems' would, of course, be negated.

Well there you have it.

You certainly do.

[xKatieBabyx]

...

[smithy115]

[quote='MissEsoteric' pid='51697' dateline='1364761443']
I am not adorning the usual prefixed platitudes; with 'all due respect', or, 'please don't take this the wrong way', because you aren't 'due' any and there isn't any 'wrong' way to 'take' this, just the one way.

[quote]Hi Again,

I am new to this but I was wondering what would u think is the average number of clients a WG will meet in say an average week???
please provid ur best estimate.

Thank you
[/quote]

It is the author of an OP who inevitably must assume responsibility for pitching the tone of their thread appropriately, assessing the credibility of their post within the community. Your opening gambit, and post in its entirety, fails obnoxiously to display even an attempt at decency and respect for the majority of the members of whom this forum comprise.

But hey, who the fuck am I to bust your balls? We all misjudge things in these mediums, it's so easily done when reliant upon word alone. On the contrary, though, when the cheapness of your question (and manner in which it is posited) is alluded to, by way of perfect;ly civil reply, the ignorance of your initial comments and clearly premeditated arse-hole-ness, surely must be cemented as fact?

[quote]What does it matter how many clients a working man or Woman will see in a week?
[/quote]

So, you chose to publically pose the most personal, sensitive, private questions to a group of women, without introduction, being relatively 'unknown' to many members, without any explanation as to your purpose in asking the WG's to divulge to you their wholly private business and without the foresight or emotional intelligence to even share something of your own experience or opinion or feelings about the topic and as such find you are asked, politely and succinctly, to shed some light on these points, perhaps before being quoted on the number of cocks 'worked' in the time period of your choice.

[quote]Who got out of the wrong side of the bed ??? I am curious, but by the sound of you -- may I suggest the numbers will be low.[/quote]

You respond to this, utterly measured, polite request, with a condescending jibe, worsened only by the laughable hypocrisy apparent in the post of a man clutching at bitchy comments and sly digs as a way of retort to a completely sane question. "........may you suggest........"? May I suggest you quite swiftly realise as to the crippling lack of authority, resonance, interest or substance, any such a suggestion from you will be subject to.

[quote]Like you, I was curious hence I asked what it mattered.

Are you any more or less likely to see a certain escort if she sees one man a week or ten? Why do you arrive at the certain decision that you make? Is it down to a perception you've made about the escort?

I didn't get out of the wrong side of the bed, I was engaging you in conversation.
[/quote]

I directly challenge you to produce one single example, from the post above, to support the claim you make below.

[quote]I was asking the innocent question out of curiosity. Not for any underlying *motive that you seem to be adhering too*, chill out huni. All I wanted to know was the average numbers per week i.e. 1, 21 or even 101.
Apologies if I have upset or annoyed any one, it truly was not meant. I am new to this, honestly.[/quote]

*A 'motive' can not be 'adhered to', much less 'adhered TOO'

What planet are you on??????? Completely barking!!!!!!

[smithy115]

I don't think he is unknown. I'm pretty sure he's the same guy that was on here bothering us before, the one we mostly thought was underage... I could be wrong of course, but either way he's not doing a great job fitting in here.

Listen Katie Baby I did not think I was bothering anyone but asking sensible questions. If I have offended you I apologise , truly I am new to this and I am in my fifties with little experience.
I will shut up from now on.

[Simon]

There are some "legitimate"reasons for being curious. However, it's been pretty obvious to me that the answer would be "it varies".

I know what it's like to pass the previous client on my way in and the next client on my way out: that was disturbing on several levels. So I'd hope that she was allowing sufficient time between bookings.

On the other hand, if it's an escort I like, I would be concerned if she wasn't getting enough bookings to keep her in business. Many escorts have disappeared from my hotlist, the turnover seems high. I've noticed that when an escort actually replies to my enquiry, it's rare for her to say "can you make it an hour later?", implying that her schedule isn't close to being filled up. Sometimes escorts actually say that they're part-time or have other commitments, or so busy that they don't have spaces for the next fortnight: in those cases, I suggest a time and let the escort choose the date.

One thing I've been curious about is how weekdays, evenings, weekends and holidays compare? Presumably married guys (like me) prefer to book time off work on weekdays or call in at 5:30 or thereabouts when "working late", whereas single guys would go for evenings or weekends. One normally very reliable escort couldn't offer me a full hour on Boxing Day, so I took half an hour - lots of guys escaping from their families after Xmas?

[smithy115]

Cheers SImon --- I am also married and I must admit your question is interesting. Looks like I can't do any thing right at the moment with some of the ladies. I am only interested as my lack of experiance shows, but do seem to be putting my 3 feet in it.

[sarahxxx]

Looks like I can't do any thing right at the moment with some of the ladies. I am only interested as my lack of experiance shows, but do seem to be putting my 3 feet in it.

I think it was down to your inability to actually explain why you wanted to know such information, it turned out it was just a random question for the sake of it. It would actually have been better if you had of had a reason to ask the question.

How many times would you visit an entertainment business and start asking how many clients they had had in that week, try it at your local cinema / restaurant / pub / wine bar. I am not sure any would be that willing to tell you.

As it turns out the answer is irrelevant as apart from being curious, you have no idea why you want to know that information or what the answer would actually mean to you, should somebody have replied.

The answer also varies greatly as people work in different ways, have different needs. For the last four weeks my average amount of punters per day / per week has been zero, due to me not working.

Sarah x x x

[smithy115]

Point taken, I am severely chastised and apologises if I have offended any one.

[Trinity-Belle]

One thing I've been curious about is how weekdays, evenings, weekends and holidays compare? Presumably married guys (like me) prefer to book time off work on weekdays or call in at 5:30 or thereabouts when "working late", whereas single guys would go for evenings or weekends. One normally very reliable escort couldn't offer me a full hour on Boxing Day, so I took half an hour - lots of guys escaping from their families after Xmas?

Yes, that is absolutely right... in fact, even unmarried guys are more likely to come during work hours... so to speak.

Most of my business is mon-fri between about 10am and 6pm

I'm rarely asked to work evenings or weekends.