17-07-2017, 21:23
I respect what you do, and there are plenty of girls out there that need protection from these kinds of group admins, but I'm not sure I'm following your logic here.
You didn't want to add less talk daily pay to the scam list because you were able to pick up the pieces? Fixing the problem doesn't make his actions suddenly ok.
Going by that blog, going by the many complaints here and stripperweb, this rico character is a nasty bit of work. He's screwing and threatening his own members. Letting everyone know they're a scam would have been a better path to take rather than allowing cam girls to get into a potentially horrifying situation and then fixing it later. Girls in this industry are vulnerable, he shouldn't be a part of it.
If you warned people about rico ahead of time, you wouldn't need to constantly fix the problems he causes. Everytime you pick up the pieces, you're enabling him and he's validated of his horrid behaviour and won't need to change.
You didn't want to add less talk daily pay to the scam list because you were able to pick up the pieces? Fixing the problem doesn't make his actions suddenly ok.
Going by that blog, going by the many complaints here and stripperweb, this rico character is a nasty bit of work. He's screwing and threatening his own members. Letting everyone know they're a scam would have been a better path to take rather than allowing cam girls to get into a potentially horrifying situation and then fixing it later. Girls in this industry are vulnerable, he shouldn't be a part of it.
If you warned people about rico ahead of time, you wouldn't need to constantly fix the problems he causes. Everytime you pick up the pieces, you're enabling him and he's validated of his horrid behaviour and won't need to change.
![[-]](https://adultworkforum.com/themes/andreas09-purple/collapse.png)