Tours Please

[sarahxxx]

I'm talking about serious allegations designed to damage the reputation of a wg or punter that are often made by new members or even first time posters,

I am sure that is not correct, are you suggesting that somebody that has posted before should be allowed to make a false allegation?

I'm not talking about your average negative review the kind of thing I might write..............."20 minutes into the booking and XXXXX seemed to have lost all interest paying far more attention to her phone than my cock etc etc" or a standard wg's response "Nova was 15 minutes late and had a stroppy attitude from the moment he walked in and OMG his chronic bad breath was a huge turn off etc etc"

Are you suggesting these type of remarks are not serious allegations and do not reflect badly on an individual?

I am sure there are plenty of people out there that would disagree with you, what is the point of a review system if things that are said do not matter?

Would punters not see "20 minutes into the booking and XXXXX seemed to have lost all interest paying far more attention to her phone than my cock etc etc" as a warning against seeing that wg? Do you not think it may put off potential punters? To help you out, your answer can only be a yes!

A review of that nature is allowed to be published without proof of it happening. And as you have said many times, there are many fake reviews posted so that brings the whole review system into disrepute and makes a joke of everything.

I have said it before, you guys need to get yourselves together and sort yourselves out, so many punters actions reflect so badly on the rest of you, making yourselves look like a bunch of idiots

Sarah x x x