10-02-2016, 15:58
Both soliciting & kerb crawling are illegal so not relevant to the issue, so as you say, it is totally misleading. Nothing new there if you are trying to confuse what other think to get your objective across.
One of the issues being considered is "Whether criminal sanction in relation to prostitution should continue to fall more heavily on those who sell sex, rather than those who buy it."
As it is not illegal to sell sex then how is that relevant? There are some draconian laws that can be used to prosecute those who profit from prostitution, one of the reasons that you are not allowed to take money through the AW system. Although, I believe, it is not now illegal for a husband to live off his wife if she is a prostitute.
Why should a landlord of a property be prosecuted for, knowingly, allowing a prostitute to run a legal business from his property?
How can prostitution possibly be seen "as violence against women" if I am a consenting adult, acting out of personal choice and do not feel violated.
Trafficking: this is an issue we all agree on, a girl working for the benefit of others against her will, but how much of it actually goes on?
Trafficking can have two meanings:
1. A person can be considered to be trafficked if she is used for sexual exploitation against her will
2. A person can also be considered to be trafficked if she works for an organised business willingly and is moved around the country to work.
There are also other ways that females can be sexually exploited, these include being coerced to work as a prostitute by a lover / partner, although they are doing it willingly, it is still under duress if she is not happy about doing it.
The law really has no right to interfere with what consenting adults get up to in private.
Sarah x x x
One of the issues being considered is "Whether criminal sanction in relation to prostitution should continue to fall more heavily on those who sell sex, rather than those who buy it."
As it is not illegal to sell sex then how is that relevant? There are some draconian laws that can be used to prosecute those who profit from prostitution, one of the reasons that you are not allowed to take money through the AW system. Although, I believe, it is not now illegal for a husband to live off his wife if she is a prostitute.
Why should a landlord of a property be prosecuted for, knowingly, allowing a prostitute to run a legal business from his property?
How can prostitution possibly be seen "as violence against women" if I am a consenting adult, acting out of personal choice and do not feel violated.
Trafficking: this is an issue we all agree on, a girl working for the benefit of others against her will, but how much of it actually goes on?
Trafficking can have two meanings:
1. A person can be considered to be trafficked if she is used for sexual exploitation against her will
2. A person can also be considered to be trafficked if she works for an organised business willingly and is moved around the country to work.
There are also other ways that females can be sexually exploited, these include being coerced to work as a prostitute by a lover / partner, although they are doing it willingly, it is still under duress if she is not happy about doing it.
The law really has no right to interfere with what consenting adults get up to in private.
Sarah x x x
![[-]](https://adultworkforum.com/themes/andreas09-purple/collapse.png)