Is age important?

[English Kate]

I have never been fussy on age or felt that one age group treats you any more different than other age groups, much the same as I do not have a problem with race or colour.

Its the person I have a problem with when they are rude or arrogant and that can be any age or race

Whilst I do the job as an escort for the money, it is better when you get turned by the client but I am there for their enjoyment and pleasure not mine.

Sarah

I always say that from my perspective I would never want to see a girl if I didn't feel I could help them to enjoy the experience at least as much as me. That's part of the challenge. If I thought that a girl was lying there thinking "oh lord only another 45 minutes and I can get rid of this loser" then I wouldn't partake in the game. It has to be a two way street for me.

Apart from the loser bit that is exactly how I felt that fatefull day when I decided enough was enough and reduced my age limit.

[Ana_X]

I notice that some of the escorts who use adultwork specify an upper age limit which, unfortunately, is usually younger than I am! For example, a lady in my area with all the "attributes" that I was attracted to, refused to see anyone over 59. While I don't deny any WG the right to choose who he she wants to see for whatever reason, I wondered what you ladies thoughts were on this and if any of the other men have found this to be the case, especially you older guys.

Well look at it this way and let me ask you, were you looking for a woman in her late sixties to late seventies? If not, why not? I would suspect that it is because age is important on some level to some people.

I can only imagine that for escorts, be they male or female, it is important that they enjoy the work that they do, and find their clients attractive on some level/s which might tick their boxes and in turn make the date highly enjoyable for both parties. If an escort simply took every client which came their way regardless of their own preferences don't you think this would cheapen the experience and create an air of 'hole for hire', thus the client would be willingly and blatantly commodifying the man or woman he has booked? From reading the forum I've surmised that clients like to be treated well and to have their bodies genuinely enjoyed, so an escort with no preferences of his or her own and a revolving bedroom door wouldn't be able to provide for that - I would assume.

Clients get to browse and window shop for the escort which meets their desires, why shouldn't an escort have their own set of criteria which clients need to meet?

If I've whittled on then please do forgive me, Just an outsiders point of view here.

[sarahxxx]

I always say that from my perspective I would never want to see a girl if I didn't feel I could help them to enjoy the experience at least as much as me. That's part of the challenge. If I thought that a girl was lying there thinking "oh lord only another 45 minutes and I can get rid of this loser" then I wouldn't partake in the game. It has to be a two way street for me.

Unless we have seen somebody before we do not know who is going to walk through the door, but at the end of the day it is our job to make sure you leave happy having enjoyed your experience and that you return.

If you enjoy sex then it makes the job even better but men should really learn that woman enjoy different things, what turns one women on will not do it for another.

Then there are those punters who do not care if the woman enjoys the time as long as they do, I do not have a problem with that after all I am being paid to be with them.

But as usual every person be it girl or guy has different needs and expectations, guys get to choose who they see so they have the choice if they do get the right vibe from the girl not to see her again. Likewise we can refuse to see guys should we wish to.

Sarah

[hornynomad]

I notice that some of the escorts who use adultwork specify an upper age limit which, unfortunately, is usually younger than I am! For example, a lady in my area with all the "attributes" that I was attracted to, refused to see anyone over 59. While I don't deny any WG the right to choose who he she wants to see for whatever reason, I wondered what you ladies thoughts were on this and if any of the other men have found this to be the case, especially you older guys.

Well look at it this way and let me ask you, were you looking for a woman in her late sixties to late seventies? If not, why not? I would suspect that it is because age is important on some level to some people.

Touché and I can't and won't argue with that, Ana. You have a vey valid point. At the end of the day we all have our reasons for who we choose as a partner, whether we are provider or client.

I think the issue really revolves round whatever criteria we use to make our choices, not just age. But thanks for the responses. This is what I like about this forum: getting so many different points of view!

[SassyAnn]

I've had great bookings with guys of all ages, and crumby bookings the same - so age isn't really the factor I decide on.

[Lady_Lust_XXX]

Bottom line is though .............. being a prossy is ................ 'hole for hire' ........... with the exception of dom where sex doesnt take place.

[Nick Meanswell]

Bottom line is though .............. being a prossy is ................ 'hole for hire' ........... with the exception of dom where sex doesnt take place.

I know I'm naive - even gullible. But I definitely need to believe that the relationship with the girl for the time is much more genuine - I know what you're getting at, but to put it so bluntly, it just wipes away any semblance of fun for anyone.

I think that paying a girl for fun is bit like going to see Father Christmas when you're a child, except that your parents pay for the fantasy - I don't think my dad would pay for my fantasies!

[Lady_Lust_XXX]

Bit is posh ............ it is a business for us ......... that doesnt mean we dont have/dont want to have fun .... that can still happen too ............... but it is still 'hole for hire'. Its in the same vein as names for prossies, escorts, courtesans ............. the list is endless. In the end, if you take money for sex you are still a prossie no matter what dressing you put on it. Nowt to be ashamed of either.

There really isn't a 'relationship' either, its just a meeting of two/three/four or however many people. When a client starts seeing the meeting as 'a relationship' that is when the meeting starts to get 'dangerous'.

[Nick Meanswell]

Bit is posh ............ it is a business for us ......... that doesnt mean we dont have/dont want to have fun .... that can still happen too ............... but it is still 'hole for hire'. Its in the same vein as names for prossies, escorts, courtesans ............. the list is endless. In the end, if you take money for sex you are still a prossie no matter what dressing you put on it. Nowt to be ashamed of either.

I definitely agree that it is nothing to be ashamed of - I just wish we lived in a more enlightened society where it wasn't seen as a mortal sin, and more as a vital private social service.

I may have been very lucky, but in general I believe I have met some of the nicest, kindest people on AW, and I mean that most sincerely.

[Lady_Lust_XXX]

Well im off for kip now posh ............ have a good night and sleep well. xx