kenny m
09-05-2011, 17:08
Well they seem to have been able to get some folk of the front pages, but twitter has made the matter a little bit more public.
We live in the world where folk love publicity, but go to the other extreme when it is something negative, or threatening, which is okay for those that can afford it, but the rule of not naming is indeed causing problems for others who are innocent, as speculation does seem to cover folk who are not guilty.
Thus making a mockery of the system, what do others think, if you were about to get exposed and had enough money to keep it out of the press would you do so at the risk of dragging someone who is innocent into the equation.
We live in the world where folk love publicity, but go to the other extreme when it is something negative, or threatening, which is okay for those that can afford it, but the rule of not naming is indeed causing problems for others who are innocent, as speculation does seem to cover folk who are not guilty.
Thus making a mockery of the system, what do others think, if you were about to get exposed and had enough money to keep it out of the press would you do so at the risk of dragging someone who is innocent into the equation.