Most annoying things when you are looking for an escort on AW

[sarahxxx]

Still, I have met some nice escort girls through here.

Glad you are enjoying yourself, I do not use the RB system myself, but I am guessing that there could be improvements. as you have suggested. Maybe next time they organise a Q&A with Adultwork management, you could put forward your ideas.

Sarah x x x

[Nova70]

Another issue with the site is that to make a reverse booking, I have to specify and exact date and time. And so an escort who likes the ideas but is busy at that time will not bid on it. What I really want to know primarily is which escorts really want to give what I have asked.

I haven't done that many RBs but yes your right a date range for the meet would be a good option, you can of course mention that in the section of the RB where you describe what your looking for but if it gets passed by because of the stated date that won't help.

[Nova70]

With regards to the profiles: too many look the same. I prefer to see a nicely dressed woman in a profile picture with a pretty face than a naked one or loosely dressed one. (I do know what is underneath, you know). A better way to search what I'm really looking for other than reverse bookings might be nice.

I know what an engine looks like but if I was buying a car I'd still have the bonnet up to make sure it was in good condition.

[knight_rupert]

Another feature I would like to suggest on AW is that as well as "public" and "Private" galleries, there could be a type of gallery that is only visible when logged in.

I think many of the WGs would be more willing to display facial photos if it were only available to punters with accounts.

[Ana_X]

Another feature I would like to suggest on AW is that as well as "public" and "Private" galleries, there could be a type of gallery that is only visible when logged in.

I think many of the WGs would be more willing to display facial photos if it were only available to punters with accounts.

Shite people will, member of AW or not, spot someone they recognise on such a site and try to out them or cause them hassle. If the SP only shows face in paid areas and someone tries to out them, then at least the SP can come back with 'you must have paid for my services to know this' kind of defence.

[knight_rupert]

That I'm a punter who uses Adultwork is not something I really want to make public.

If you're referring to "private" galleries, then I don't know how many pay to use them but I don't. I prefer to use my money to punt, or place a reverse booking. The photos I see on the profile or in the public gallery make an impression on me, as well as the response I get and any messaging.

There could be some kind of "reputation" level: maybe at least 3 positive reviews from different service providers?

[Ana_X]

That I'm a punter who uses Adultwork is not something I really want to make public.

If you're referring to "private" galleries, then I don't know how many pay to use them but I don't. I prefer to use my money to punt, or place a reverse booking. The photos I see on the profile or in the public gallery make an impression on me, as well as the response I get and any messaging.

There could be some kind of "reputation" level: maybe at least 3 positive reviews from different service providers?

Precisely. Hence, if all face pics are kept behind a pay wall then the person doing the outing is at much a risk of being outed himself, so it'd put such a person off. Wasn't pointing at that being your motive by the way.

Private galleries are popular, it's the place to see rude content the provider has produced and if it's handled well it can be some people's sole source of income which is why there's a setting on our side of 'provide content only'.

In any case (and back on point) it's down to each individual escort if they want to show face or not, and if it ever became a forced issue there'd be an exodus from AW of SPs taking their fees for paying to feature, display mobile numbers, feature by country/region etc. AW aren't known for putting up with losing income over punter wants, so I can't see that happening any time soon.